73. The Mission noted that the Government strived to help it succeed in its task and remove any barriers that might stand in its way. The Government also facilitated meetings with all parties. No restrictions were placed on the movement of the Mission and its ability to interview Syrian citizens, both those who opposed the Government and those loyal to it.
75. Recently, there have been incidents that could widen the gap and increase bitterness between the parties. These incidents can have grave consequences and lead to the loss of life and property. Such incidents include the bombing of buildings, trains carrying fuel, vehicles carrying diesel oil and explosions targeting the
police, members of the media and fuel pipelines. Some of those attacks have been carried out by the Free Syrian Army and some by other armed opposition groups.
79. The Mission arrived in Syria after the imposition of sanctions aimed at compelling to implement what was agreed to in the Protocol. Despite that, the Mission was welcomed by the opposition, loyalists and the Government. Nonetheless, questions remains as to how the Mission should fulfil its mandate. It should be noted that the mandate established for the Mission in the Protocol was changed in response to developments on the ground and the reactions thereto. Some of those were violent reactions by entities that were not mentioned in the Protocol. All of these developments necessitated an expansion of and a change in the Mission’s mandate.
The most important point in this regard is the commitment of all sides to cease all acts of violence, thereby allowing the Mission to complete its tasks and, ultimately, lay the groundwork for the political process.
71. The Mission determined that there is an armed entity that is not mentioned in the protocol. This development on the ground can undoubtedly be attributed to the excessive use of force by Syrian Government forces in response to protests that occurred before the deployment of the Mission demanding the fall of the
regime. In some zones, this armed entity reacted by attacking Syrian security forces and citizens, causing the Government to respond with further violence. In the end, innocent citizens pay the price for those actions with
life and limb.
26. In Homs and Dera‘a, the Mission observed armed groups committing acts of violence against Government forces, resulting in death and injury among their ranks. In certain situations, Government forces responded to attacks against their personnel with force. The observers noted that some of the armed groups were using flares and armour-piercing projectiles.
27. In Homs, Idlib and Hama, the Observer Mission witnessed acts of violence being committed against Government forces and civilians that resulted in several deaths and injuries. Examples of those acts include the bombing of a civilian bus, killing eight persons and injuring others, including women and children, and the bombing of a train carrying diesel oil. In another incident in Homs, a police bus was blown up, killing two police officers. A fuel pipeline and some small bridges were also bombed.
28. The Mission noted that many parties falsely reported that explosions or violence had occurred in several locations. When the observers went to those locations, they found that those reports were unfounded.
29. The Mission also noted that, according to its teams in the field, the media exaggerated the nature of the incidents and the number of persons killed in incidents and protests in certain towns.
30. According to their latest reports and their briefings to the Head of the Mission on 17 January 2012 in preparation for this report, group team leaders witnessed peaceful demonstrations by both Government supporters and the opposition in several places. None of those demonstrations were disrupted, except for some
minor clashes with the Mission and between loyalists and opposition. These have not resulted in fatalities since the last presentation before the Arab Ministerial Committee on the Situation in Syria at its meeting of 8 January 2012.
50. Some observers reneged on their duties and broke the oath they had taken. They made contact with officials from their countries and gave them exaggerated accounts of events. Those officials consequently developed a bleak and unfounded picture of the situation.
68. Since it began its work, the Mission has been the target of a vicious media campaign. Some media outlets have published unfounded statements, which they attributed to the Head of the Mission. They have also grossly exaggerated events, thereby distorting the truth.
71. The Mission determined that there is an armed entity that is not mentioned in the protocol. This development on the ground can undo
Iepazīstaties paši ar to ko Arābu Līgas novērotāji raksta atskaitē: www.columbia.edu
Tātad atzīst ka bruņotas bandas eskalē vardarbību - ne Sīrijas armija. Tas ko jau rakstu vairākus mēnešus. Tāda nu ir patiesība.
Nopludināti Arābu Līgas novērotāju atskaites kas atzīst ka nav tikai miermīlīgu demonstrāciju un ka ti kādi spēki kas esaklē vardarbību un tā neesot Sīrijas armija - bet gan dažādi teroristu grupējumi kā arī tā sauktā brīvā Sīrijas armija (dezertieri).
arī gulags ir rietumnieku izdomājums, nacistu koncentrācijas nometnes bija tikai pāraudzināšanas nami nepaklausīgajiem un japāņu darba nometnes bija tropu sanatorijas sagūstītajiem sabiedroto kareivjiem.
tikai nezin kāpēc pēc diktatoru krišanas parasti atrod pārpildītus cietumu pagrabus un masu kapus
Es atkal dzirdēju ka sīrijas līderis spēlē šahu ar Velnu un jāj uz trīsgalvaina pūķa....
Tie ir meli un propoganda, un mūsus mēdiji to publicē, vai TVnets kaut ir pārbaudijis to informāciju koi viņi šeit raksta???
Tas ir tā pat kā ar tiem 60 tūkstošiem nogalināto, kuri pēc tam pacēla telefona klausuli.
Meli, meli, meli, meli, nekrietni meli .......... Cik var melot?! Irāku iznīcināja ar meliem. Lībiju iznīcināja ar meliem. Ēģipti iznīcināja ar meliem. Un viss, lai varētu kļūt neatkarīgi no Irānas naftas, lai varētu turpināt uzsākto melu kampaņu un ļaut Izraēlai iznīcināt Irānu. Kāds ārprāts!
Pasaki lūdzu, kas ir labāk?
Skatīties kā tas režīms apspiež un nogalina cilvēkus, vai arī ļaut tam visam beigties vienkārši gāžot režīmu?
Un tikai nesaki, ka tie ir ASV meli un tā tālāk. Ir simtiem adreses, kur ir ielikti video, kā Sīrijā slepkavo cilvēkus.
jedritvaikociņš » Jānis2012. g. 3. februārī, 19:32
Nuja, vnk ārprātīgākais ārprāts. Es tavā vietā jau sen būtu nopircis JYSKā akcijas striķi + vienmēr lētu tabureti un pakāries, lai nebūtu jālasa un jāšausminās par to superārprātu. Padomā - tev pašam būtu labi+tīkami un TVNETa lasītājiem - vēl labāk.
Tu liecies tāds eksperts patiesības zināšanā, varbūt esi bijis šajās vietās un redzējis tur notiekošo, ja vari apgalvot, ka cilvēktiesību organizācijas par visu melo?
Demokrātijas iekarošana. Savulaik, Čērčils, Britu salu pārvaldnieks, teica -jātaisa sūdi jo būs jātaisa demokrātija un pēc tam tas slavenais teiciens : Demokrātija [ ... visi tāč zina.............. ?!
Nu beidziet tak, izdzimteņi, krist virsū neatkarīgai āfrikas valstij.....Jūs redziet ko esiet Lībijā izdarījuši......ASV, vai bez terorisma un bandītisma nekādi nevarat???? Tieši ASV ir nejēdzīgākā terorisma valsts.....Baidos, ka te būs savs vārds sakāms Pakistānai un Irānai......,varbūt pat abām kopā!????? Pie viena smagi jo smagi Telavivai arī ietrāpīs.......
«Human Rights Watch» ir Christian In Action (CIA) korporācija-tā pat kā lielākā daļa visu t.s. propogandas ruporu.
We Like War: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDkhzHQO7jY
Vienu "pilsoņu karu" Lībijā jau pieredzējām:
Vienā pusē ir:
- Sudānas armija
google: Sudanese army seizes southern Libyan town
google: Sudan armed Libyan rebels, says President Bashir
- Kataras armija
google: Qatar admits sending hundreds of troops to support Libya rebels
- ASV, Francijas, Lielbritānijas, Jordānijas sauszemes specvienības
google: Libya conflict: British and French soldiers help rebels prepare Sirte attack
google: Foreign forces in Libya helping rebel forces advance
- Al Qaeda bruņotie grupējumi:
google: Libya: the West and al-Qaeda on the same side google: Hundreds of Libyan Jihadists May Have Been Released From Jail
google: Flying proudly over the birthplace of Libya's revolution, the flag of Al Qaeda
- NATO (tas arī bija galvenais izšķirošais spēks - kas gan var pretoties ja dienu un nakti bombardē mājas, skolas, slimnīcas, ūdens padevi, elektrības infrastruktūru? Neviens. Pārāk daudz šausmu NATO sakarā lai visu nopublicētu.)
google: NATO bombs kill Libyan civilians in Tripoli http://youtu.be/xDis_T6Qm7U
un otrā pusē - Lībijas tauta: http://youtu.be/nSnlIlATIKw http://youtu.be/FYDr8sVIKyc